Power Quality Newsletter - April 2006
In this Power Quality Newsletter:
- What does electricity cost?
- Upcoming power quality seminars - world-wide
- Power quality instruments - what does "Class A" mean?
- Useful article - Conformity Magazine
- Power Quality Teaching Toy program - update
- Forest fires and power quality
- A useful book
- PQ Standards updates
- More on cable shield grounding
- Future topics
What does electricity cost?
I'm often asked how much electric power costs around the world, so I've prepared a map - you're welcome to use it in presentations. Please, can you help? For many countries, I can't find a typical price per kilowatt-hour for industrial customers in 2005.
If you have some information that I could use, or even an estimate, please send me an e-mail - Alex@PowerStandards.com

PSL_World_Map_Electricity_Prices.jpg
Upcoming power quality seminars - world-wide
I will be teaching various seminars over the next few months, emphasizing practical hands-on power quality solutions. I hope to see you somewhere around the world!
Power Quality Standards updates
- IEC 61000-4-30 Power Quality Measurements Corrigendum has been completed, and is circulating.
The next edition (possibly 2008) will include a survey-class instrument, and an Annex about how to
do power quality surveys. Please send me an e-mail if you want more information - Alex@PowerStandards.com
- SEMI F47 We've completed the 5-year update of this voltage sag immunity standard, and it will be issued in June 2006. The new version is much simpler: just test at three critical points, and use IEC 61000-4-34 as the test standard. The sag depths and durations are unchanged. Please send me an e-mail if you want more information, or if you would like to participate in the next update, which I am organizing now - Alex@PowerStandards.com
- IEC 61000-4-34 and 61000-4-11 These voltage dip immunity standards are working well. The next meeting to work on updates, corrections, etc. will be in Italy in September or October - please send me an e-mail if you have any suggestions - Alex@PowerStandards.com.
- A proprietary Korean semiconductor voltage sag standard I can't discuss this one with everyone, but I've been asked to discuss this with U.S. and European and Japanese semiconductor equipment manufacturers. If you qualify, send me an e-mail and I'll give you the latest information - Alex@PowerStandards.com
- CIGRE-CIRED JWG C4.110 Not really a power quality standard, but an interesting joint working group between CIGRE and CIRED, that is starting work on voltage dip immunity in installations (nobody is quite sure what that last word means, but I'm sure it will be straightened out). The group is led by Prof. Math Bollen, so we can expect excellent technical work. Our first meeting took place in Sweden last week, with experts from a number of countries. I have been assigned the chapter on probabilities and economics, so I need help! If you have ideas, references, or suggestions, please send me an e-mail - Alex@PowerStandards.com
Power quality instruments - what does "Class A" mean?
What does it mean when an instrument is advertised as "Class A"? IEC 61000-4-30 explains the detailed requirements for certifying whether an instrument complies with Class A or Class B, and Power Standards Labs has just developed the definitive protocol for testing instruments. We're using it now, and we've found out that certifying -- especially for Class A -- is not a simple process. In fact, I've become quite skeptical about many instruments that are "certified" for Class A.
If you would like a copy of PSL's Test Protocol, I would be glad to share it - just send me an e-mail - Alex@PowerStandards.com. Meanwhile, unless the instrument has a Certificate from an authoritative Calibration Lab, I would be scratch my head and think carefully before assuming it really is Class A.
Useful article in Conformity Magazine
Conformity is a monthly magazine that covers news and trends in the testing and certification of electrical products. Their latest issue has a useful front-cover article on "Voltage Sag Testing for Commercial and Industrial Equipment" - www.conformity.com/0604/0604voltage.html. It's an excellent introduction to the new IEC standards and SEMI standards, and it shows how laboratories all over the world are using PSL's Industrial Power Corruptor (www.PowerStandards.com/SagGen.htm) to toughen industrial equipment against voltage dips and sags.
Power Quality Teaching Toy update
English - Deutsch - Espanol - Français - Portugues - Italiano - Polski - Svenska - Româna
My program for engineers and students, the Power Quality Teaching Toy, keeps on growing.
It's free, so there's no support - sorry...
In Europe, the Leonardo Power Quality Initiative (lpqi.org) tells me it is among their most popular downloads.
Some ideas for future updates: Mats Hager in Sweden has some interesting ideas about transformers and phase shift, and I think Willem Meijs in Holland would find transformer impedance simulations useful. Do you have ideas? Please send them to me.
Also, if you would like to translate the program into an additional language, I would be grateful. (At the moment, I can only work with translations in Roman characters, so Japanese, Arabic, Russian, Korean, Chinese, Thai, etc. will have to wait.)
Forest fires and power quality
|
In my last newsletter, I asked if anyone could explain the mechanism that links forest fires and voltage interruptions.
Richard Schomburg of Electricté de France provided the most concise answer. He remembered an old report from CESI (Italy) that said the first cause of dielectric rupture is in fact the air temperature at about 800°C because of a much lower gas density, the second cause is the presence of carbon particulates that fragment the interval, finally the ionization if much higher temperature are reached. Xavier Momo, also of EDF, points out another mechanism: dilatation of cables actually makes them hanging closer to the ground......and creates a dielectric insulation reduction. He is not sure that 800°C would be enough to have a significant ionization effect.
I did a little web-based research myself on plasma -- gases that are sufficiently hot that their electrons travel freely, i.e. the gas is a conductor. Research papers on plasma consider "low temperature" to be in the range of 2000 degrees C, and "low voltage" to be in the range of 5 million volts (!). It appears that plasma in air requires at least 1500 degrees C at atmospheric pressures. The temperature of a forest fire at its hottest point is about 800 C - only half the temperature necessary for plasma. So I would be inclined to look towards the carbon particulates and cable droops, and not so much towards plasma, for the initiation of an arc. Of course, once the arc starts, the temperatures can certainly rise to plasma levels.
P.S. During an informal conversation last week in Sweden, Ulrich Minnaar of ESKOM (South Africa) mentioned an interesting solution that I don't quite understand. Apparently transmission line voltage dips can be reduced by encouraging sugar cane farmers to burn their fields at a different time of day - a simple, low-cost solution. If only it could be applied to forest fires!
|
A useful book
Here's a short 150-page paperback book that I strongly recommend - Crimes Against Logic, by Jamie Whyte of Cambridge University. It's full of amusing and useful reminders of how faulty reasoning, statistics, and wrong words can lead us all to incorrect conclusions at times. You can buy it on-line at amazon.com for about US$10. Myself, I've read it twice now, and enjoyed it both times.
Future topics
Here are some topics I plan to cover in future newsletters. Please, send me your suggestions!
- Why don't electric companies have voltage sag/dip standards?
- Neutral-ground voltages - what they mean, and what to do
- Transformer impedance, harmonics, and earth leakages
- How we distribute power inside Power Standards Lab
Still more on shield grounding question
In my last couple of newsletters, I discussed which end of the shield on a signal cable should be grounded: the source end, or the load end. There is a great deal of certainty on the topic, but no consensus.
I have continued to receive interesting correspondence on the topic, and I think I will let my old friend Francois Martzloff have the final word, who writes:
"My own recommendation in a surge-prone environment, dating back to GE days and taught to me by Frank Fisher and Keith Crouch, was definitely to ground both ends of the cable, but to do that at one end via a pair of two or three series-connected power-rated diodes in anti-parallel connection: the forward drop of each string is sufficient to block the power-frequency current that tries to flow between distant grounds at different potentials, but in case of a difference caused by a surge, the diodes allow part of the surge current to flow in the shield, producing the zero-sum effect so well described by some of the contributors. This produces a glitch in the data transmission during the surge, but protects the connected equipment during that surge."
Francois's very useful archive covers almost everything that is known about surge protection in low-voltage AC circuits. I recommend it.

Francois
Martzloff
In the next few months I will be in Hong Kong, Malaysia, Canada, France, China - perhaps we will get to say hello somewhere. In any case, I will always be glad to hear from you via e-mail.
With best wishes -
(I have sent this e-mail to you at '[recipient]', because you are on my personal world-wide list of 8,100 engineers, educators, and students interested in power quality. If you no longer wish to receive it, please let me know.)